Potential Impact
This
project is aimed at organising at a European level the expertise in
Metabolomics and Lipidomics and to design a strategy for the life
sciences beyond the already well-organized areas of Genomics and
Proteomics. The impact of this proposal will extend well beyond the
conclusion of the project. In the process of organising and mobilising
the field of Metabolomics and Lipidomics we will bring together basic
researchers, clinical scientist, clinicians, industry and
representatives from other areas of life sciences research. The
diversity of activities, scientific meetings, networking and policy
meetings, on-line discussion groups, a survey of expertise and the
publication of position papers will not only result in a strategy on
Metabolomics and Lipidomics research for the direct actors involved,
but it will also bring attention to this field of research and thus
inspire stake holders to seek contact and establish strategic
alliances. We believe that we have allowed for every possible
opportunity for crossover between basic science and medical and
commercial application. We are involving representatives from the
clinic and from industry and create a series of meeting opportunities.
This project is a starting point of a very exciting time for the area
of Metabolomics and Lipidomics. From the recent international
developments we can expect an increase in interest for this field.
Discoveries in Metabolomics and Lipidomics are often easier to exploit
than discoveries in Genomics and Proteomics. Knowing the genetic code
and subsequently knowing the structure of a protein rarely provides a
drug directly. It provides clues for the design of such compounds.
Often Metabolomics and in many cases Lipidomics becomes involved at
that point. The drug that may target an interesting protein is mostly
amphipathic and therefore lipidic in nature.
Currently the level of organisation in the area of Metabolomics and
Lipidomics is not as evolved as in the area of Genomics and Proteomics.
However from those fields we have learnt that a research area can form
very rapidly. We have already started the survey of strengths
represented in this consortium. This exploration of strengths and
expertise and also the exploration of common grounds for further
research or exploitation will continue. This SSA could provide the
essential means for keeping the momentum of this research field.
After a strategy has been formulated for the field of Metabolomics and
Lipidomics we expect that Participants in the ELIfe consortium and
representatives from outside the consortium will join and start actual
research projects. Our open-door policy assures that this is not a
definitive consortium, it is a group of researchers who have taken the
initiative to model the strategy of Metabolomics and Lipidomics onto
the highly successful strategy of the areas of Genomics and Proteomics.
This initiative will bring European stakeholders together and form a
breeding ground for new initiative. We will welcome these initiatives
and participants from outside our consortium as the impact of our
proposal lies for a large part in the follow-up activities.
Shaping a field as large as Metabolomics and Lipidomics is an
undertaking that simply cannot be completed at the national level.
Involving actors from industry and health care demands that we look
across borders. No single country hoards the complete expertise
necessary to build a consortium as the one proposed here. We have been
careful to involve Partners from a wide range of European Countries. In
the course of the project we aim to identify national representatives
of Metabolomics and Lipidomics and invite them to our activities.
Each of these persons (or groups of persons) will be urged to act as a
contact towards the national fora for Metabolomics and Lipidomics
research, and, where these do not exist as yet, to take the initiative
to create a national network based on the information obtained in the
survey of expertise and infrastructure within the Lipidomics field
(T2.4).
Contributions to standards
The new technology in lipidomics, notably the analysis of lipid
structure via mass spectrometric techniques starts to yield an
unexpected range of novel lipid structures. It is obvious that this
requires an update of the present generAL nomenclature of lipids which
dates back to 1976. As a consortium, we intend to be actively involved
in the further development of a consistent lipid nomenclature and
intend to represent European lipidologists in the relevant world-wide
discussion fora.
IUPAC-IUB Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature. 1977. The nomenclature of lipids.
Recommendations (1976) Lipids. 12:455-468.
IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN). 1989. The nomenclature of
steroids. Recommendations 1989. Eur J Biochem. 186:429-458.
Chester, M.A. 1998. IUPAC-IUB Joint Commission on Biochemical Nomenclature (JCBN).
Nomenclature of glycolipids--recommendations 1997. Eur J Biochem. 257:293-298.
Contribution to policy developments
The fact that most of our meetings are open to participants from
beyond our consortium creates the opportunity for researchers,
clinicians and industry across Europe to benefit from this activity.
More and more National Funding Agencies and policy makers look at the
European dimension of applications. We feel that this Project will not
only strengthen European research efforts, but that it also will
facilitate the shaping of national policies and research activities,
both in applied and fundamental research. Involving policy makers
in the kick-off meeting and in the scientific meetings with emphasis on
life sciences (ELSO), lipid biochemistry (ICBL), lipid technology (Euro
Fed Lipids) and the combination (General Meeting: "New concepts in
lipidology: from lipidomics to disease") will ascertain a translation
of the technical side of the field into national and supranational
policies in science, health and industrial applications. One field of
application where the three meet is the field of nutrition and health.
Technological development will allow more detailed analyses of lipid
patterns in diseased and healthy persons, which will drive discussions
with the food industry concerning the potential positive and negative
effects of different types of (lipid) nutrition on human health. New
health policies may be drawn up as a result.